Throughout our article below, we'll use the words overwhelming and overly complex a lot.
Many of the most popular project management tools are designed for large teams and organizations, and they can be overwhelming and complex to set up and use for smaller teams. Here's what to keep in mind:
We see more often than not that teams actually jump into implementing a project management tool too early believe it or not.
The main question we'd ask is, does your team currently use a CRM? If so, is your project management/task needs actually simple enough to not require an entire standalone tool for it?
Believe it or not, pipelines within a CRM can actually be a great alternative to a project management tool for smaller teams. With the introduction of a standalone project manager comes with a lot of added work as mentioned above.
Now this is totally fine and possible, just trying to flag that many smaller teams and startups might be trying to create too much complexity and structure, when they really just need to move quickly, pivot, and figure out their process before actually implementing a proper project management tool.
Ok, let's get into your best project management software options + project planning platforms ⤵
.webp)
.svg){kind=icon}
-v2.webp)
Use AI to plan your work, automatically. Be 137% more productive. Use the AI assistant for busy people and work teams.
Motion (also often referred to as Use Motion and Motion App) is in a category of it's own that we've been referring to as time management…
Let me explain:
Motion's main goal is to take care of all of your team's needs revolving around time. If you're someone that wakes up in the morning and looks at their calendar app to see what you have on for the day, Motion App will fit in like a glove.
It connects in deeply with your Google Calendar, Microsoft Calendar, and even Apple Calendar, allowing you to build out project management and task management for yourself and team members. The best part is that all of these tasks automatically organize themselves based on priority right onto your calendar (and your team's) to ensure the most important (and blocking) tasks get done.
If you've heard of the productivity app terminology of "time blocking", well Motion does that automatically using AI, no manual time blocking needed.
It even goes to the degree of allowing you to share meeting scheduler links with others, all while respecting your existing events across all of your calendars (and even your team's calendars), along with automatically inviting team members into the appointment once booked.
With your entire team using Motion, it's like you have a full-time personal assistant shared across the company, ensuring that everyone is getting deep work done all while focusing on what is most important (at the most ideal time), all while making sure that no one is ever double-booked.
All of this makes for an incredibly powerful tool for individuals, but exponentially more valuable with every additional team member you add. No other project management or daily planner tool on the market seems to go to this degree.
As compared to some of the best project management software on the market often mentioned like Asana, Monday, ClickUp, Motion has taken their sights on slightly smaller teams of between 1–50 people.
This team size target is based on their current feature-set, from what we've seen. For example, the larger teams that we work with who have many layers of management often require reporting capabilities over everything else. And with Motion, that's not something you're going to get, because they are currently focused on giving the only AI project management tool on the market focused on helping the individual and teams, over the needs of upper-management.
So if you and your team are used to spending a lot of time planning deadlines, and rearranging your "My Task" view in the existing tools on the market, Motion flips this on it's head with the use of AI. Something to consider if you're fed up with the manual work involved with traditional project management tools.
Compared to the best daily planner apps on the market like Sunsama and Akiflow, Motion is the only daily planner we've seen that actually leverages AI to plan your day for you. With all of the other apps in the category, you need to manually drag in tasks to time block and plan each day. This is an incredibly time consuming process, that some justify as being "more mindful", but once you actually have AI schedule your day for you, you realize how much time is actually wasted "mindfully planning your day".
Compared to the best calendar schedulers on the market like Calendly and Chili Piper, Motion bakes in the core functionality of these tools, with the added visibility of team tasks and urgent deadlines, actually booking off availability for you and your team if high priority work needs to get done by a quickly approaching deadline.
Large teams (100–500) with other enterprise software implemented will find integrating Motion more involved than other enterprise tools. When using an enterprise software stack like that of Salesforce, it's common for other project management tools to have native integrations.
With Motion, it will require a custom integration approach (something that we actually help teams do). But while it's possible, one might ask if it's worth making the large investment in a custom integration when you might be able to get something more native out of the box with the other tools focused on larger teams.
(This of course depends on the actual integration needs of your team, as native doesn't always do exactly what you'd like it to do).
Motion currently lacks advanced reporting and dashboard functionality. So while you can see at a top-level the status of projects and tasks in Kanban and Listviews, even a team workload view, that's about where reporting dashboards end, making it less suitable for large teams requiring extensive project analytics.
If all of that connects with you and you think it might fit your needs, they have a 7 day free trial that you can use along with your team to see what it's like having a personalized AI assistant.
.webp)
For medium + large teams looking for a task-based project management tool, where goals and reporting are important.
Asana is one of the most reliable and stable project management tools on the market. We used it for 7 years before switching to Motion. We didn't switch because Asana was bad... Asana is fantastic, as long as you take the time to set it up properly and actually need all the features it offers.
Asana is exactly what a comes to mind when you envision a traditional project manager tool. It has traditional lists view, tasks view, custom fields, kanban boards, calendar (which isn't even worthy of the name when you compare Asana vs Motion), files, and timeline views. It even has robust project management features like gantt charts, workload management and advanced reporting features. If your organization has complex projects and is looking for a tool with all the bells and whistles, including reporting for upper management, then Asana would be our top recommendation for you.
Asana is now a public traded company and it's focusing more on enterprise accounts (1000+ seats). With that, comes more enterprise features, which, we'll never need as a small team.
Our needs are much more simple—we simply wanted a tool to help us get more work done fast (hence why we made the switch to Motion - read our full Motion review to better understand it's features).
When comparing Asana vs Monday or Asana vs ClickUp, Asana wins across the board. Why? Because Monday and ClickUp are trying to be "all-in-one tools", meaning they are trying to do everything in a mediocre way, rather than doing one thing super well. Asana is a project management software, through and through. They aren't trying to be a CRM, or a documentation software, or whiteboard or whatever other tool under the sun.
This means that 100% of their focus is on delivering the best project management experience. And that's what we appreciate about them! 🙌
You will like Asana if you fit into one or all of the below categories:
.webp)
The main difficulty with Asana comes from from how much manual work is required to actually stay atop of the work you're trying to get done. Unlike a tool like Motion, where you just throw in your tasks and AI intelligently auto-schedules them, even if you don't get to them for the day, Asana requires that you continually push back due dates manually in order to not fall too far behind or get too overwhelmed with your work.
Asana is an incredibly well oiled product. The API has evolved a lot over the years and everything is quite stable. It just hasn't evolved to take advantage of the time management/calendar space, which feels like a big miss for any project manager.
That said, we've just finally finished migrating off Asana over to Motion (after 7 years of Asana), which should tell you something, specifically if you are a small team (less than 100–200 employees).
A better way to build products for product and engineering teams of all sizes.
Linear is in an interesting category. It's in one way a product tool (e.g. focusing on bugs, feature requests, and sprints/cycles), and another part project management (for managing the tasks around the cycles).
The thing is, Linear is very much built for your engineering and product team to tie in all of this information together. You'd be hard-pressed to use Linear as a replacement for the company's general project management tool.
If you're heavily a product-focused company, and most of your employees are engineers and product people though, you can probably get away with just using Linear as your team's project manager.
While some people may say that Asana is a main competitor, we'd probably say that your product/engineering team is trying to fit into the more general project management needs of the rest of the organization.
It's not uncommon for much larger companies to use a general project management tool like Motion or Asana, along with Linear. Heck, even the engineering/product team at Motion uses Linear internally (alongside Motion of course).
The main competitor in this area is really the Atlassian suite (mainly Jira), and, well... Linear is just better and more modern in just about every way. Teams that use Linear often greatly enjoy using it, and have an appreciation for it (hugely advocating it). Whereas teams that use Jira when asked what they think would typically respond with an "it's fine, I guess".
Linear also integrates quite well with modern software like Slack via Dispatch. Their API is a joy to work with, and we're actually starting to see modern teams integrate their software with Linear before even that of Jira. That said, most any enterprise tool will integrate with Jira more likely than Linear. So it really depends on the size of your team and the accompanying stack that you're using.
The project manager for large teams looking for an all-in-one task and documentation tool.
ClickUp is best categorized as an "all-in-one tool", even though it started off as more of a project manager, and is quite task management focused at the core. ClickUp now offers tasks, docs, whiteboards, time tracking and even chat. They are truly trying to do it all.
ClickUp appeals to folks who want one tool to manage all work-related projects and processes. These folks don't typically need nor want the best project management tool, or best docs, or best of anything, they just appreciate that one tool (ClickUp) bundles all the apps together under one subscription.
For instance, say you were looking for the best project management tool, then you'd want to consider Asana for larger teams, or Motion for smaller teams (if you're seeking simplicity) because they are both focused only on one thing: project management.
You might like ClickUp if you fall into one or all of the below categories:
The main complaint we've heard about ClickUp is that there is too much configuration and customization. We know this is draw for some, but for most folks, the amount of stuff going on within ClickUp is overwhelming. For instance, many of their features are irrelevant if you're just wanting to use ClickUp for project or task management, making the simple things difficult to find and accomplish.
With that, users of ClickUp report feeling like there is too much clutter that gets in the way, making it difficult to find where things are or you are shown buttons that you have no idea what they're used for. There are SO many options to sift through that you can't find what you're looking for unless you've been using the platform extensively and know it inside and out.
With too much "noise", it's easy for team members to miss being notified in a thread, spending too much time searching for things or wondering about the progress of projects. This steep learning curve for teams makes it difficult to truly adopt and buy-into.
Another complaint we've heard countless of times is that ClickUp is slow to load. While this might not seem like a big deal at first, when you're waiting 3-5 extra seconds for a tool to load, it can certainly get frustrating and slow you down.
Jira is a suite of agile work management solutions developed by Atlassian. It is designed to facilitate collaboration across teams, from concept to customer, and is used by software, IT, business, and operations teams among others.
Jira Software started off focusing on helping software teams to manage project development—think sprints, agile and scrum methodologies. But in 2021, Jira launched what they call "Work Management" to help greater business teams like marketing, HR, finance, and design.
This meant that they introduced other features that tools like Asana and Monday have, like different views (task list view, timeline view, kanban board view) and forms.
What does this all mean? Well first and foremost, Jira is designed for highly technical teams and the other "work management" features were created in an effort to compete with Monday and Asana and gain more market share.
With that, don't expect Jira to be a project management tool with a friendly user experience. It has a steep learning curve with a ton of features, with many of them that will never be used an average business.
With that, while Jira has been previously known as one of the best agile project management tools, there are newer tools on the market that are much more modern and simple to use. Keep reading to find out what they are ⤵
Jira is for enterprise engineering teams (1000 employees +) who work with traditional project management methodologies like scrum and agile. Jira calls itself a customizable workflow engine that allows users to track issues, bugs, tasks and other work items through pre-defined workflows.
If your team is already using the likes of behemoth software solutions like Salesforce and NetSuite, then Jira is probably a solution that will fit into your software stack as an enterprise team. When configured correctly, Jira can be useful in the software development space.
A Scrum Master is a professional who leads a team using Agile project management through the course of a project. Teams who have the most success with Jira have a full-time salaried employee (aka Scrum Master) whose job is to mange the project and spend most of their day in Jira.
When speaking with employees of enterprise companies using Jira, they've mentioned that when they first implemented Jira, they also hired multiple Scrum Master's to manage a handful of projects each. But with budget cuts overtime, Scrum Masters were let go, and the job of "Scrum Master" fell on the shoulders of the Business Analysts on the team. This resulted in employees needing to do numerous jobs, burn out and team members leaving the company altogether.
That said, if you're thinking of implementing Jira, make sure you also have the budget to hire employees (often numerous) to work exclusively within Jira to keep things on track. If you don't, skip implementing Jira altogether and opt for something more simple like Linear for software development.
If you have less than 1000 employees on your team and you are considering using Jira Work Management, we're here to say that it's not a good idea. There are MUCH better tools on the market — Asana if you're a larger team, or Motion if you have 100 employees or under. These project management tools are friendly, have beautiful interfaces and your team will actually want to use the tools.
If you're looking for a project management tool that works "out of the box", Jira is not for you.
There are newer, better tools for managing software development sprints.
We're seeing modern software development teams prefer the likes of Linear for issue tracking, as Linear is much more beautifully designed (while teams typically find Jira cluttered and complex). Linear is also much easier to set up than Jira.
Another newer solution for project management is Motion. Motion is ready to use out of the box and teams love that tasks appear right on their calendar in time blocks. Read our full Motion review.
If you are looking for a project management tool for anything other than software development, we don't recommend Jira. Look—sure they offer features built for marketing and design, but we can guarantee your marketing and design team will hate using Jira (they likey won't adopt it either). Why? Because they are marketing and design teams 😄 They want to use user friendly software with an intuitive interface that is easy to use—not a tool initially built for engineers. Same goes for construction teams, financial planners, HR teams, and onwards.
Jira is highly customizable, making it too complicated for the average person. Expect a steep learning curve for every the most simple of features, as many folks who use Jira end up overwhelmed. If you're looking for an intuitive, easy to set up tool, Jira is not for you.
Jira Roadmaps enables cross collaboration among different departments, making projects visible company wide. This helps teams stay on track with the bigger picture and track progress and dependencies based on team availability.
Once Jira is configured correctly, assigning tasks and stories to team members is easy so you can easily see who is working on what task.
To implement Jira, you must have deep IT and technical experience due to it's steep learning curve and customization requirements. Expect to work with a Jira Solutions Partner which can cost over six-figures for a larger organization. Your team will need to be onboarded slowly and keep in mind that regular trainings will be required.
For instance, simple things like writing Jira descriptions require you to use markdown for bolding, italics, and bullet points. Busy team members have expressed being deeply frustrated with the time it takes formatting text to write updates to the team. Our take? This isn't a good use to of time for anyone 😅
Employees who have used Jira have reported it being slow at times. For instance, they said that while the search functionality was useful, it could sometimes be very slow.
A project management tool is only useful if it's being regularly updated by team members. Because of Jira's overly complicated nature, employees often don't share updates in Jira during each sprint, waiting to only update Jira at the very end. When we asked why, they mentioned it's because "they dislike Jira, try to avoid it, and they are too busy doing actual work than spending time updating the project management tool."
Jira has over 3000+ integrations with other tools. That said, for enterprise tools like Salesforce or Zendesk you're very likely looking at a custom integration that will need to be managed by a third party.
Unless you're a super large enterprise with thousands of employees doing agile project management, Jira is not worth considering as a project management tool. It will be highly complex to set up and user adoption will require a lot of training due to the overwhelming features.
Instead, we recommend that engineering teams consider Linear for issue tracking and all other teams (marketing, design, HR, and onwards), or consider Motion that is much more user friendly for the average person (and your team will actually enjoy using it).
An all-in-one project management tool and suite of products for teams.
Monday started off as a project management software, but in order to gain more market share, continued to build tools and expand their offering. They went from being a project management software, to an "all-in-one" tool. They now offer products such as Monday "Work Management" (aka project management), Monday sales CRM and Monday dev (for agile workflows).
When comparing Asana vs Monday Asana wins in the category of project management. Why? Because Monday is trying to be "all-in-one" tool, meaning they are trying to do everything rather than doing one thing super well. Asana is a project management software, through and through. They aren't trying to be anything more.
One area where Monday stands out is it's vibrant interface and bold colors that adds a sprinkle of fun when managing projects. They have different ways to visualize data, like using a 5 star rating system (for priority for example) or timeline views to see project progress. Dragging and dropping tasks in is relatively easy and intuitive. That said, users have reported Monday to be quite buggy in terms of functionality, so when comparing Monday vs Asana in terms of stability, Asana wins this category also.
While Monday offers tiers for small teams, we'd think there are better tools for teams with under 300 employees (like Asana or Motion). That's not to say that smaller teams don't use Monday (they do), it's just going to take quite a bit of work to set it up for success.
Here are the categories, we'd specifically recommend Monday for project management. You may fit into one or all of the below categories:
The main difficulty with Monday is actually getting it setup for success. Many folks create an account, invite their team, pop in some projects and then it sits there as an abandoned tool, with no one on the team actually feeling like its reliable. This comes from not doing a proper Monday implementation (often means working with a consultant). Mapping your processes to Monday and creating team documentation will lead to higher chances of success.
If the above sounds overkill for your business, consider something like Motion as that's more so a project management tool that you can get set up out of the gate and have your team using it fairly quickly (read full Motion review).
.webp)
A shared documentation and note taking tool that tip-toes the line of a flexible no-code platform (for teams of all sizes).
Notion positions itself as an "all-in-one" workspace tool, but that doesn't mean it's ideal for "everything."
At its core, Notion is a knowledge base or wiki, designed for documenting company processes and notes. Over time, Notion has expanded its capabilities, allowing users to link notes, create databases with formulas, and more.
Notion's versatility allows you to customize it into almost anything you need. This flexibility has led teams to use Notion as a CRM, project management tool, task manager, knowledge base, and more. However, just because Notion can be adapted for various purposes doesn't always mean it should be. We often receive feedback from teams who've tried using "Notion for everything", only to find it becoming overwhelming and messy.
If you want to use Notion, use it as a knowledge base/company wiki (or use Slite, our top pick and what we use 😉). For specific business functions like project and task management or CRM, it's usually better to opt for dedicated tools built for the job.
A huge drawback of using Notion for CRM or project management is that you're now building your system from scratch. Even with available templates, you'll find yourself investing a lot of time in learning to configure Notion and tailoring it to your processes.
In contrast, a project management tool that is developed by a team focused solely on creating the best product in that niche, will much more quickly set you up for success.
Just think about it: when you're using a project manager that was built for that function, this means that their entire team focused on building the best project manager out there. So you're already getting a tool with project management features that are useful to thousands of other businesses. While with Notion... well guess who is going to be building said features? YOU 😅
The reality is, we often hear people say "but my business is unique so I need a custom solution, which is why Notion is appealing".
After helping teams of all sizes and in many industries for over a decade, we promise you that business processes are not that unique and 95% of the time can be (and should be) mapped to the structure of existing tools.
Oh and if you're considering using Notion as a CRM, make sure to read this dedicated article as to why we don't recommend that either.
Notion offers a free tier for up to 10 guests, making it accessible if you're curious about its capabilities. Notion has a free tier for up to 10 guests, so if you're curious as to what the hype is about, you can easily sign up and start playing with it yourself. If after a day you start feeling overwhelmed, you're not alone, it's more or less a blank slate after all.
Shortcut unites planning and development into a single experience with tightly integrated Issue Tracking, Sprint Planning, Roadmaps and Goals.
Shortcut used to be called Clubhouse and they were spiraling as a company, forced to rebrand because the perception around them wasn't great.
The marketing team changed what people thought of them as, but from a tech stack perspective, they are an incredibly old company, over a decade old, built atop a super legacy tech stack.
So if you're looking for a modern project management tool, we'd say avoid this decade-old software product with loads of tech-debt.
Trello brings all your tasks, teammates, and tools together.
Trello is probably a project management tool that most people have heard of. It was one of the first project managers to hit mainstream popularity because it was the first project manager to allow for kanban board view from a web app, bringing with it a super user friendly interface.
This was an incredible feat back in 2011 and what resulted in its rise to popularity, especially in the B2C space (general consumers, not majorly breaking into the B2B space). For example, you'd use Trello to manage your personal tasks, maybe more as a prosumer, and less as a business owner.
We used Trello here at Efficient App for years, before ultimately switching to Asana, when they too added kanban functionality, as we felt that Trello sort of got a bit stuck, while their competitors were evolving and working to further innovate in the project management space.
Rating: D
The main differentiation that Trello had was kanban board functionality, and that's about where it started and ends. Thing is, kanban view is now a staple of any modern project manager on the market in this day and age.
Feature set wise, since Atlassian now owns Trello, they've prioritized integrations within the Atlassian suite.
Rating: C-
Let's just say, here's a screenshot of Trello from 2011:
And here's Trello today:
.png)
If this is how much Trello has evolved over the span of 12 years, do you genuinely think that Trello is a leader in the space? To us, it feels more like a relic from the past. There's been huge strides in web development technologies, design esthetics, and more over the past decade, just seems like Trello has failed to get the memo.
Rating: C
Trello does board view well, but that's about the bulk of it. As they haven't really seemed to update Trello much in the past 6+ years, the bulk of the credit that we can give Trello comes from it having incredibly deep integration with the Atlassian suite of tools (e.g. Jira,Confluence, and Bitbucket).
With Atlassian's acquisition of Trello, came with it more of an integration with Atlassian's tooling.
Rating: B+
Trello actually has a pretty solid mobile app on both iOS and Android. This is in part to how much time they've had to perfect it. Early on, being more in the B2C space, and coming out more when the iPhone was gaining major traction, a solid mobile app is something that the general consumer wanted. So this is something they've spent a lot of time perfecting.
Rating: B+
We also have to give Trello credit in this area. They have a super robust API and powerful Zapier connector. If their Zapier connector doesn't have quite what you're looking for, you should be able to do chat you'd like to do using their developer API.
If your team is heavily relying on the Atlassian software stack, then Trello is likely to bring with it some native integrations to help your team out as well.
When looking at the best project management tools on the market, we just can't put Trello that high up on the list. They feel like a very safe solution that hasn't seen any innovation since it was first created.
If you're looking for a modern tool, you'd probably be better off looking at something like Motion vs Trello. If you're looking for something that is solid and stable and has all the project management basics, we'd just be hard-pressed to not recommend Asana over Trello in about every category.
Trello is nowhere the best project management solution on the market, but it is one that most have likely used in the past, or have at least heard of.
We feel like Atlassian acquired Trello to have some type of solution in the project management space, so that they can try to get teams to use and rely on the entire Atlassian suite. Essentially, turning the parent company more into an all-in-one solution, by leveraging many different software solutions, along with native integrations.
We're hard-pressed to recommend Trello for that reason, unless your team is heavily reliant on the Atlassian software stack. If you're not, then pretty much any project manager on our top project management list will serve you better.
A project management tool built to streamline all workflows.
Wrike is often the tool favored by larger organizations or teams with complex, multi-faceted projects requiring advanced project management features and deep customization. Wrike is more of an enterprise-level project management tool (think similar to the Salesforce of project management).
While Monday and Asana are more user-friendly in terms of their user interface, Wrike's interface has a steeper learning curve due to its extensive features.
Wrike’s integrations are particularly beneficial for enterprise-level software ecosystems, think Salesforce, Adobe Creative Cloud, Jira, SAP, ServiceNow, and Tableau.
Wrike has an edge in advanced reporting and analytics compared to Asana and Monday.com, offering detailed insights that are crucial for large teams and complex projects.
In summary, unless you're an enterprise company, do not consider Wrike. If you're a team with under 1000 employees, Wrike alternatives like Asana or Monday will be much better suited for your team.
.svg)
.svg)
.svg){kind=logo}
.svg){kind=icon}
.jpg)
%20YouTube.webp)
.svg)
