.webp)
.svg){kind=icon}
For small + mid-size teams looking for a truly customer-focused help desk, shared inbox, and live site chat.
We use Help Scout for sales, customer support, admin, receipts (e.g. we forward all of our receipts into an inbox), invoicing, and even recruitment. We've been using Help Scout for over 5 years and we love it!
Help Scout can be best described as a customer-centric tool. They have done an incredible job at building somewhat of a community around their software. For example, when I see a company is using Help Scout (on either the website chat or email response), I have an immediate reaction of feeling that they care deeply about customer support and will have equally caring support reps.
I'm also part of their "Support Driven" Slack community as well and am regularly seeing teams of all sizes (big and small) actually switching over to Help Scout from Zendesk, Intercom, and Front, amongst others.
Rating: B+
They have a nice implementation of live chat in their product, as it's actually thoughtful (and further customer-focused). How you might ask? Expectations matching. For one, you have to mindfully to mark yourself as "available", and if you aren't actively in Help Scout for a long enough period of time, it will automatically mark you as "away" (wait that's a feature...? hold on, let me explain).
There's nothing worse than having a "live chat" on your website that gives the impression that you'll get an immediate response, but in reality, you just get a bot that asks for your email address because "the team is away". It's a bad expectation mismatch. Help Scout doesn't allow this to happen.
They have more of an "email first" approach, with a "we might be live though" as a secondary. So when the live chat shows on your website, you can be sure that there's actually a human on the other end. Great expectation matching, which as a small team, I appreciate a lot. Now take that, versus Intercom, which simply upon seeing the logo, you and everyone else expects to speak to someone immediately, and if you aren't on the other end, they get frustrated - you're set up to lose versus surprise and delight (which is what Help Scout constantly allows for). If you're a small or mid-size team, why not set yourself up for success and delight out of the box?
One of the areas that got me obsessed with Help Scout many years back was their robust workflows functionality. You can set up either automatic or manual workflows. Automatic is great when you can set up some type of consistent trigger, like when a due date is today and the conversation is active or pending, then mark it active, set the priority custom field to P1, and add the tag "due":
Pair this with the API and you can trigger some pretty powerful workflows both inside and outside of Help Scout. Just be careful with that "Apply to Previous" option, we've totally made some pretty big mistakes by accidentally having it enabled with a broad trigger. 😅
The manual trigger functionality can be used for easily triggering many different things to happen with the click of a button. For example, set up a manual workflow for "snooze" and set it to add the tag "snooze", change the status to "pending", and set the due date to a week from now. There's no shortage of things that can be done here.
Help Scout has gone a human-centric approach to AI (unsurprisingly, as it's true to brand). What they've done is things like, automatic summarization of chat threads. So if you're jumping in and out of threads and collaborating with team members on a daily basis, it'll help you get back up to speed, without having to read the entire conversation thread:
We for one appreciate how Help Scout has handled their approach to AI, as when comparing Help Scout to Intercom for example, Intercom tries to rope in AI at every corner, in chat, and trying to automate conversation threads. While this is cool in theory, it does feel a bit like we're back in the "you must first talk to a bot before talking to a human" time period, which still is a bit frustrating. I'm sure Help Scout will do more in this area as AI continues to evolve in time.
Help Scout also has some pretty cool AI assist features coming to the actual compose window, pulling the likes of ChatGPT directly where you're actually responding to messages:
All-in-all, we know that Help Scout will have an excellent customer service-focused approach to any future iterations to their AI capabilities. Help Scout AI Assist actually reminds us a lot of the new AI functionality recently rolled out by Superhuman actually—funny enough, Superhuman actually uses Help Scout as their helpdesk software solution.
Rating: B-
Help Scout has had a pretty similar UI for the past 6–7 years, it wasn't until just recently that they started investing heavily into modernizing the conversation view (which is where you're likely to spend the majority of your time).
To that, they did a good job with it—feeling similar to other modern help desk tools:
.webp)
We don't have any major complaints aside from just wishing they would also modernize the main dashboard, along with some tweaks to the new conversation view to allow it to take up more vertical screen real estate when typing longer messages. To that end, you start feeling a bit cramped, because they want you to be able to still scroll up and view the prior conversation. That said, the team is hyper aware of this, and have even shared with us some internal mock-ups on how this could be remedied. 👀
Important note: the UI shown above is as part of an opt-in only alpha/beta group that we're in, so if you were to sign up today, it'd look slightly different from the above (for now).
Rating: B+
Help Scout does most all of the things you'd like a help desk to do for you. From saved snippets, to internal notes, and more. When it comes down to the micro-experiences when using the software, Help Scout does not let you down. It has features like "Collision Detection" to prevent you and a team member from replying at the same time:
In addition to that, you can actually see the emails that your team members are writing, and even jump in to edit them on their behalf if you need to make some tweaks before sending it off. Help Scout is truly a collaborative Help Desk.
They also regularly auto-save messages as you type them, so if your internet cuts out or browser crashes mid response, you'll be totally fine 👌
The updated mailbox and editor also includes a super powerful "/" feature, similar to that of Slack, which allows you to type anything—quickly pulling out an emoji, saved reply, text formatting, or even switching to a note—no keyboard shortcut memorization required:
But on the keyboard shortcut front, they have that too. Press "S" then "C" to quickly close out a conversation and move to the next one. "W" to show all your workflows. Pretty much everything is accessible via a keyboard shortcut which makes navigating Help Scout a breeze.
Rating: B-
Their API is also super flexible! They also have a great Zapier integration which is always appreciated, it is just a bit limited at times in the trigger functionality especially, so you might want to use their webhook functionality instead for trigger events.
We've managed to do a lot with it though, check out the video below to see how we've integrated Help Scout with Asana and Copper.
They do have a native integration with Slack though that we love, pulling in a quick preview of new conversations, with the ability to set a separate channel per mailbox, allowing you to truly prioritize messages:
Pair this with a tool like Dispatch and you can do some incredibly powerful notification/mark as read rules within your and your team's Slack inbox. For example, one of your team members only want to be notified in Slack channels when they're @mentioned inside of a Help Scout note? That can be done. How about marking all channel messages as "read" unless the customer email domain contains xyz.com, you can do that too. Dispatch paired with Help Scout + Slack is amazing.
Rating: B-
I feel they are so close to being great in this area, a real B+ experience. The thing is, the app is a bit buggy from time to time. You can accomplish most of what you'd like to do on-the-go, the thing is, it's missing some core features like the "workflows" functionality. This means, if you rely heavily on workflows when using Help Scout, you're going to be a bit frustrated when on mobile. I'll admit, I've definitely visited the desktop app on my phone every now-and-again to run a quick workflow 😅
On the plus side, the have an iOS and Android app, and both have similar feature-parity. It really just needs that final 20% added to the mobile app to make it great. They have said that they are planning a pretty big re-architecture of the mobile app once the new mailbox (screenshot above) gets publicly launched—mobile comes next!
If you want to hear more of our thoughts about Help Scout and how they stack up against their competitors, check out this post.
Are you a customer-centric organization? Does the idea of automated and templated emails sending to your customers/clients give you pause? If so, Help Scout has you covered.
They enable you to service your customers, without just treating them as a number (unlike that of Zendesk vs Help Scout).
We absolutely love Help Scout, use them ourselves, for hours a day at times—Be sure that if they didn't have an absolutely delightful experience and team, you'd be hearing from us!
The all-in-one help desk chat tool for teams of all sizes. Great if you want to offer support from all channels to your customers and don't mind not having as much control.
My main question here is, are you planning on having your social channels and chat apps as your main source of support?
I mean really, think about that question deeply. I understand that the gut reaction is "yes, that would be great!"—but maybe those 5 customers of yours that prefer to message you via Facebook Messenger or Twitter DM's shouldn't be the sole cause of fragmentation across support channels, requiring you to then use a tool like Front to rope it all back in. So ask yourself, just because you "can" open up your support channels, "should you"?
If the answer is "yes", then that's where I can vouch for Front, but again, you're accepting support fragmentation, and good luck roping that back in in the future.
Again, if you're a small team, you should probably have a primary and centralized support channel, usually "[email protected]"—that way you can better control routing and tracking feedback.
Also, if you're like us and you love using Superhuman for your direct emails, you're not going to benefit from the other features of Front, like "shared inboxes" and such across the team.
You really need to use Front as your main email inbox to get the most use out of it.
The automated CX platform that delights customers, empowers your team, and drives your business forward.
We recommend using a more eCommerce focused help desk like Gorgias that will integrate with your Shopify store.
This is helpful because you can see your customer order history as a part of your help desk. And because eCommerce stores tend to get a ton of volume in support tickets, Gorgias also offers automation tools to auto-respond to common inquiries, improving response times and saving time for your team.
Popular eCommerce brands like Olipop, Steve Madden, and Marine Layer use Gorgias.
For that reason, we rank Gorgias as the best help desk for eCommerce companies due to its deep integration with the best eCommerce software & tools like Shopify.
The live chat and help desk for growing SaaS teams. Recommended only if you have a full-time support person.
Intercom is great, but is quite expensive for what you get, and it's super live chat focused.
Something I'm regularly reminding small businesses of is that having a live chat has a huge (hidden) cost associated with it, especially as a small team.
It brings with it anxiety of responding (had one client that wouldn't use the restroom out of fear they weren't there to respond to a customer shortly after implementing Intercom into their business.
Yep, it's safe to say that it didn't last very long for their small team, they are no longer using Intercom.
They also charge based on number of contacts and the various components (features) and it gets wildly expensive very quickly.
They are great though and the industry standard for live chat (if you can justify having a few full-time employees to manage your live chat).
Bring all your customer conversations from your support channels – like Slack, email, and forms – into a single, lightning-fast interface. Integrated with the tools you already use, backed by their powerful API.
Plain has taken a unique approach to the best help desk space by doing what the name suggests and taking a more "plain" and simple approach to it all.
A single inbox for support teams to prioritize and respond to customers across email, Slack, and other areas. You're not meant to think of Plain as a shared inbox, like many of the other best help desks mentioned.
Plain is focusing heavily on product-teams that can benefit from deeper integrations with tools like Linear, Slack, and Stripe.
The standout features of Plain are actually the deep native integrations. If you're using Stripe for your product, you can easily display all the details of the plan and purchases on the right-hand side.
In-fact, the same is the case with Linear + Slack, you can easily turn a Slack message into a support ticket and spin up a Linear issue from that, pulling in full context to one place:
So if you're a team especially that has shared Slack channels with customers/partners, Plain has a pretty impressive integration with Slack that we haven't really seen with any other Help Desk on the market.
If any of the above integrations sound exciting, they great! You're probably in their target customer profile, if not? That makes sense, it's for quite a specific type of product team, one that is likely using Linear and Slack already.
Just to be clear, Plain is not a shared inbox in the general sense, so you're not going to want to send to it "contact@ admin@ billing@", you're going to only want to use it for your support@ channel, for customers who you specifically want to respond to, likely via an SLA.
If you're looking for a more traditional help desk (or shared inbox), you might want to check out Help Scout instead. That said, if the above fits your use-case, then we think plain is a fantastic choice, and super promising in the somewhat stagnant and uninspiring help desk space!
Team inbox and chat tool that empowers teams to collaborate around email, SMS & social media messaging apps.
While we don't think Missive is the best email app, it does solve two problems really well. The first being that it helps consolidate all your inboxes across different platforms (email, WhatsApp, SMS, social media).
The second, is that it helps team members collaborate on answering to messages. Whether it's via assigning messages to the best person suited to respond, or discussing the best way to respond privately internally via the team chat feature.
If you're looking to delegate your inbox and get your team to help respond to messages, Missive is the ideal solution. You don't need to give full access to your email inbox to team members, just simply assign the emails you want taken off your plate!
Do team members typically need your input when responding? With Missive they can easily send you a private chat message to get your help, right on the platform. All of this makes Missive great for remote teams.
If you're wanting team collaboration on emails, Missive will be a better choice as Superhuman doesn't have these features (yet anyway!). Also, if you're wanting a unified inbox for emails, SMS messages, WhatsApp, and social media DM's, Missive will also be a better choice for you.
ButiIf you're comparing Missive vs Superhuman for solo-use (without a team), Superhuman has a much more beautiful minimal UI and the user experience is also a lot more smooth. Superhuman's interface isn't designed like every other email app out there, they put a lot of thought into making email more simple to use, yet more powerful.
If you're a professional who wants the best email experience, Superhuman is going to be your best bet (it's what we've used here at efficient app for 5+ years).
That said, if you're someone who wants something more budget friendly, Missive is a good choice since they have a free plan.
Missive is a great entry into having a more established Help Desk. We might recommend it for small teams, but for larger teams there are more established tools we'd recommend.
Missive is great for Founders who perhaps are at the point of scaling their business and wanting to bring the greater team in to help support email and messaging tickets. Missive will allow you to start delegating your inbox, and in the meantime, we recommend setting up specific email addresses for different business functions (e.g. [email protected], [email protected]). Missive will be a great tool to help you start to experience this segmentation.
Once your processes are more established, you might want to switch over to a proper Help Desk. The team who built Missive is small (about 3 people), so if you're a more established business, a larger help desk company is probably what you need.
A proper help desk will allow you to have chat features right on your website and separate inboxes for different email addresses (with different team permissions). You will also get great collaboration features like assigning emails to different team members, and leaving notes for one another if further collaboration is needed. Further you get a knowledge base for creating self-service content for customers. Read about the help desk we use, Help Scout or if you want something similar to Missive, check out Front.
All this being said, if you use WhatsApp, SMS, and social media DM's as core messaging components to your business, Missive will be a better choice.
For large enterprise teams who need a highly scaleable help desk. Less user-friendly than the rest.
Think of Zendesk as the "Salesforce" of the help desk world. They "integrate" with almost everything (what that even means is many things... does that mean it'll do what you want it to do? questionable), they have help docs, an included community platform even. But what's it like to actually use? Well, painful.
There's zero joy in using it. It feels like you're using archaic and unintuitive software, I've still yet to meet a customer success rep that has had even one positive thing to say about it, or rather, I've yet to meet someone that hasn't "hated it" to be more specific.
In Zendesk, you are a ticket number, not a person. And yes, customers feel this, it's incredibly apparent and frustrating to experience:
But what about the community component? We want a community!
Well, good luck building one with Zendesk, another area I'm obsessed with, community software (love Discourse + Insided), and I have still yet to see even ONE Zendesk "Community" implementation that isn't just filled with customers complaining about said SaaS that the community was built for, with it all fallen on deaf ears by the company. That's a different story all-together though.
If you're an enterprise team, check out Zendesk, otherwise, stay away, and check out another option like Help Scout.
.svg){kind=icon}
.jpg)
-1080p-FINAL.webp)
%20YouTube.webp)
.svg)
